Cytology-based screening for anal intraepithelial neoplasia in women with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified in the pathogenesis of anal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of abnormal anal cytology and HPV in women aged ≥40 years who have a history of high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) or cancer and to estimate the prevalence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) using cytology as the primary screening modality. METHODS: Women who had a history of high-grade cervical SIL or cancer and were ≥40 years of age were included in this prospective study. Anal cytology with HPV-DNA testing was performed. All patients with abnormal anal cytology were referred for high-resolution anoscopy (HRA), and abnormal lesions were biopsied and treated if pathologically confirmed. Abnormal anal cytology correlated with HPV status, HRA findings, and clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 317 women completed the study. Of these, 96 (30.3%) had abnormal anal cytology (high-grade SIL, 12.5%; low-grade SIL, 19.8%; atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade SIL, 6.3%; atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 61.5%) and 101 (31.9%) were HPV-DNA-positive. There was a significant association between abnormal cytology results and the presence of high-risk HPV. Of the 96 patients with abnormal cytology, 30 (31.3%) had biopsy-proven AIN on HRA, representing 9.5% of the total patient cohort; of these, 10 (33.3%) had low-grade AIN and 20 (66.7%) had high-grade AIN. Older age and smoking were significant risk factors for abnormal anal cytology. CONCLUSION: Women aged ≥40 years with a history of high-grade cervical SIL or cancer have a high rate of AIN. Screening for anal cancer may therefore be considered in this patient population. The optimal screening approach should be addressed in future studies.

HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous findings from cross-sectional studies have shown human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to be more sensitive than cytology testing for primary cervical screening. This systematic review aims to assess whether the increase in baseline detection with HPV testing corresponds to lower rates in subsequent screening rounds. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (published from 2005 to 2010) comparing HPV-based and cytology-based cervical screening. Primary outcomes of interest were relative rates of higher grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer. Secondary outcomes included test performance characteristics and colposcopy referral rates. Results were pooled where possible using a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials were identified. Across studies, HPV testing was more accurate than conventional cytology and detected significantly more CIN3+ in the first screening round (Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] risk ratio 1.67; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.19) and significantly less in the second screening round (M-H RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.66). There were no differences in pooled rates of CIN2+ (M-H RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.50) and CIN3+ (M-H RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.42), but there was a higher pooled rate of CIN2 (M-H RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.68) over two screening rounds. A trend towards lower rates of invasive cervical cancer was observed. CONCLUSION: Organized screening programs in higher resource settings should consider adopting HPV testing as the primary screening test for women 30 or 35 years of age and older. Further research is needed to determine optimal screening strategies for younger women.

Cervical screening: a guideline for clinical practice in Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines to inform the Ontario Cervical Screening Program's invitations to women in the target population, provide evidence-based clinical practice guidance for practitioners, and inform policy decisions. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of relevant websites, the Medline and EMBASE databases (2005 to November 2010), and the Cochrane Library (2005 to 2010). No guidelines or systematic reviews were located that addressed the topics of interest. The evidence base consisted of seven randomized controlled trials, three case-control studies, one cohort study, and one review article. A methodologist performed data identification and extraction. Review of the data and quality assessment was carried out by the authors, who have expertise in methodology, gynaecologic oncology, pathology, and family medicine. The systematic review methods and resulting recommendations were reviewed by an internal panel with clinical, methodological, and oncology expertise. External review was provided by Ontario clinicians and other experts. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline development process led to recommendations for the optimal primary cervical screening method, screening interval, and age of screening cessation for Ontario women in the target population. There was insufficient evidence to provide a recommendation for age of initiation of cervical screening with HPV testing. The creation of an organized screening program in the province will allow the implementation of evidence-based recommendations. We provide interim recommendations for cervical screening until HPV testing has been funded.

A novel approach to the surgical management of clitoral phimosis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this case series was to outline a novel method for surgical correction of clitoral phimosis caused by vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) or lichen planus (LP) and to review the postoperative outcomes. CASE SERIES: We used the CO2 laser to treat clitoral phimosis in 20 women with LS and three women with LP. All patients underwent individualized preoperative and postoperative topical therapy with steroids or immunomodulators. Five women with LS had mild reagglutination during follow-up but were satisfied with the results, and three required reoperation, with satisfactory results in follow-up. Two women with LP required reoperation. CONCLUSION: This novel surgical technique has enabled the treatment of clitoral phimosis secondary to LS or LP, but further studies are required. Medical maintenance therapy postoperatively is a vital component of treatment.

Giant condyloma versus verrucous carcinoma: a case report.

Giant condyloma acuminatum is a large, slow-growing, exophytic, cauliflower-like tumor of the external genitalia. It is a histologically benign lesion, largely associated with human papillomavirus infection but with a high recurrence rate. The main differential diagnosis includes verrucous carcinoma. Differentiation between these 2 types of tumors is important with respect to treatment and prognosis. We present a case report of a 26-year-old woman with giant condyloma acuminata of the vulva and discuss the histological features and treatment modalities of this condition.

Late complications of childhood female genital mutilation.

BACKGROUND: Canada's immigrants are increasingly from non-English-speaking countries with different medical issues. Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a procedure performed for non-medical reasons that is not traditionally encountered in Canada and that has serious health implications for women. CASE: A 36-year-old woman, who underwent FGM at the age of four, presented to our colposcopy unit with increasing swelling of the vulva. Examination revealed a large cystic mass in the midline of the vulva, and MRI identified two well-defined cystic lesions. The mass was excised, and histologic examination confirmed an epidermal inclusion cyst. CONCLUSION: An epidermal inclusion cyst can develop as a long-term consequence of FGM. Although it grows slowly and usually without symptoms, it may require excision because of inflammation, secondary infection, or, in rare cases, malignancy developing within the cyst.

The optimum organization for the delivery of colposcopy service in Ontario: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum organization for colposcopy service delivery in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop a systematic review to inform organizational guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1996 to February 2006 for articles that reported guidance or outcomes relating to improved outcomes in colposcopy training, qualifications, accreditation, maintenance of competency, the delivery of colposcopy, reducing default from colposcopy clinics, and/or strategies to improve patient satisfaction or comfort. In addition, an environmental scan identified unpublished documents related to the delivery of colposcopy services. RESULTS: Sixteen guidance documents related to the delivery of colposcopy services were identified; 5 from the published literature and 11 from the environmental scan. These documents were used by the panel to inform the systematic review and companion guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the Ontario Colposcopy Guidelines Development Group believes that the benefits associated with the implementation of colposcopy recommendations in Ontario will result in greater organization of care and improved patient outcomes. In addition, the group anticipates that these recommendations will provide useful guidance to regional planning authorities, hospital administrators, and Cancer Care Ontario, as well as colposcopists and other practitioners, in the planning of integrated regional and provincial cancer screening services.